SUBMITTED
A specific issue is received. No conclusion is implied.
CORRECTION WORKFLOW
Correction must travel farther than the first broken sentence.
TRIAGED
The affected statement, page, and source class are identified.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Relevant sources, Source IDs, context, and counterevidence are checked.
DISPOSITION
Correct, clarify, supersede, retract, reject, or leave unchanged after review.
PROPAGATION CHECK
Dependent pages, summaries, metadata, and source-ledger records are reviewed.
CLOSED
The final state, evidence, changes, and remaining dispute are recorded.
QUICK ANSWER
In one sentence
The Correction Ledger records how consequential factual errors, clarifications, supersessions, retractions, and reviewed disputes are handled without silently rewriting the institutional record.
CORRECTIONS
Correction is strength.
A durable record does not protect its identity by protecting a broken fact. This page explains what can be corrected, what should be preserved, and what evidence makes a correction useful.
WHAT COUNTS AS A CORRECTION?
Typo
A non-substantive spelling or formatting error.
Broken link
A destination moved, vanished, or no longer supports the referenced point.
Factual correction
A verifiable statement was wrong or materially incomplete.
Attribution correction
A quote, document, author, organization, date, or source was misidentified.
Interpretive clarification
The facts remain but the wording blurred fact, inference, doctrine, or opinion.
Retraction
A claim cannot responsibly remain published in its current form.
Supersession
A newer position, version, or source replaces an older current record without pretending the older record never existed.
Disputed
A serious disagreement remains unresolved and should be visible as disagreement.
THE CORRECTION RECEIPT
Make the repair reconstructable.
| Original statement | Quote or identify the exact sentence or record. |
|---|---|
| Problem | What is broken: fact, source, attribution, interpretation, date, or link? |
| Evidence | Provide the strongest source supporting the correction. |
| Correction | State the smallest accurate replacement. |
| Affected copies | Which pages, files, or derivative statements need review? |
| Disposition | Corrected, clarified, retracted, superseded, disputed, or no change. |
WHAT NOT TO SEND
A correction does not need a dossier.
Do not send passwords, private keys, account credentials, unnecessary medical information, private addresses, or unrelated personal data. If a correction can be established with public evidence, use the public evidence.
PUBLIC CORRECTION LEDGER
Publication status is visible. Silence is not a correction.
This ledger carries a current correction/status record for each of the 24 first-edition Library articles. Most records report no change; others preserve a clarification or source-status correction. A status label is not evidence by itself—the record below must show what changed, what did not, and what weight the evidence now carries.
OPENVERIFIEDCORRECTEDEDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONSUPERSEDEDRETRACTEDREJECTEDNO CHANGE AFTER REVIEW
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-001
Your conscience is not territory.
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-conscience-not-territory
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0001, MFTAC-CLM-0002
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-002
What makes authority legitimate?
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-what-makes-authority-legitimate
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0003, MFTAC-CLM-0004
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-003
The right to change your mind.
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-right-to-change-your-mind
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0005, MFTAC-CLM-0006
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
EDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-004
Fear is not evidence.
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-fear-is-not-evidence
- Issue submitted
- The v32 no-judgment audit found person-verdict vocabulary in prose describing cognition: “People judge danger,” “affective judgments,” and “risk judgment.”
- Original publication state
- The first-edition article used “People judge danger with analysis and with feeling,” described “fast affective judgments,” and referred to “risk judgment.”
- Mistaken intermediate interpretation
- Those phrases were scientific shorthand for appraisal and estimation, but the public wording could be read as restoring judgment as an institutional ideal inside a judgment-free publication.
- v32 clarification — 2026-08-31
- The article now says that people estimate danger through analysis and feeling, calls the fast process affective appraisal, and uses risk appraisal in Ministry prose. The exact title of MFTAC-SRC-0010 remains unchanged as source metadata.
- Current disposition
- Editorial clarification only. The propositions, source set, claim classes, confidence statements, and dependency classifications remain unchanged.
- Current evidence weight
- MFTAC-SRC-0009 remains essential for MFTAC-CLM-0007 and supporting for MFTAC-CLM-0008. MFTAC-SRC-0010, MFTAC-SRC-0011, and MFTAC-SRC-0012 retain their prior supporting or contextual weights.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0007, MFTAC-CLM-0008
- Remaining dispute
- Risk and affect scholarship uses field-specific terminology. The Ministry may preserve exact source titles while choosing non-verdict language in its own explanation.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-005
Can an algorithm become an unanswerable authority?
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-algorithm-unanswerable-authority
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0009, MFTAC-CLM-0010
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-006
The Right to Exit
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-right-to-exit
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0011, MFTAC-CLM-0012
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-007
A hash proves bytes, not truth.
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-hash-proves-bytes-not-truth
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0013, MFTAC-CLM-0014
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-008
What Constructive Defiance Actually Builds
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-constructive-defiance-builds
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0015, MFTAC-CLM-0016
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-20260830-009
How Institutions Punish Questions Without Banning Them
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-institutions-punish-questions
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0017, MFTAC-CLM-0018
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-010
Why No Human Being Is Our Antichrist
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-no-human-being-is-our-antichrist
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0019, MFTAC-CLM-0020
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
EDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-011
The Difference Between Skepticism and Cynicism
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-skepticism-vs-cynicism
- Issue submitted
- The v32 no-judgment audit found “suspended judgment,” “I currently judge,” and “empirical judgment” in a page whose doctrine rejects a tribunal over persons and minds.
- Original publication state
- MFTAC-CLM-0021 and the article description used “suspended judgment.” The article table used “I currently judge the claim more likely false,” and the body used “empirical judgment.”
- Mistaken intermediate interpretation
- The wording intended provisional reasoning about propositions, not moral appraisal of people, but it left the distinction implicit.
- v32 clarification — 2026-08-31
- The registered claim and public projections now use “suspended conclusion.” The table uses “I currently conclude,” and the body uses “empirical conclusion.”
- Current disposition
- Editorial clarification only. The proposition, source set, claim classes, confidence statements, and dependency classifications remain unchanged.
- Current evidence weight
- MFTAC-SRC-0037, MFTAC-SRC-0038, and MFTAC-SRC-0039 retain their existing supporting or contextual weights for MFTAC-CLM-0021 and MFTAC-CLM-0022. No essential dependency was created.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0021, MFTAC-CLM-0022
- Remaining dispute
- The Ministry taxonomy remains an editorial research tool. Disciplinary uses of skepticism and cynicism vary, and distrust can be earned.
EDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-012
What Happens After You Lose Certainty?
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-after-you-lose-certainty
- Issue submitted
- Voice review found clinical-service framing where the page meant to state scope, evidence limits, and reader sovereignty.
- Original publication state
- The registered claim opened “A non-clinical guide…” and the shared truth boundary opened “This page is educational, not clinical care.”
- Mistaken intermediate interpretation
- The wording treated a legitimate evidence boundary as a service-desk disclaimer and let institutional caution speak over the reader’s choice.
- Clarification
- The registered claim now opens “What remains when certainty leaves…” and the truth boundary now states that the page is an educational map, not a diagnosis. The article’s scope language names the page’s limits while leaving the choice of outside help with the reader.
- Current disposition
- Editorial clarification only. The source set, claim classes, dependency classifications, confidence statements, and propositions carried by the evidence remain unchanged.
- Current evidence weight
- MFTAC-SRC-0040 remains essential for MFTAC-CLM-0023 and supporting for MFTAC-CLM-0024. MFTAC-SRC-0041 and MFTAC-SRC-0042 retain their existing supporting/contextual weights.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0023, MFTAC-CLM-0024
- Remaining dispute
- Research on role exit and belief disaffiliation describes patterns in groups and does not predict an individual sequence.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-013
Machine as Instrument, Not Sovereign
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-machine-instrument-not-sovereign
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0025, MFTAC-CLM-0026
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
EDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-014
How to Read a Claim Before Sharing It
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-read-claim-before-sharing
- Issue submitted
- The v32 no-judgment audit found the truth-boundary phrase “time constraints still require judgment.”
- Original publication state
- The first-edition truth boundary said that source credibility, expertise, primary evidence, and time constraints still require judgment.
- Mistaken intermediate interpretation
- The sentence referred to human source evaluation, but “judgment” could be confused with a verdict on a person rather than a bounded assessment of a record.
- v32 clarification — 2026-08-31
- The public truth boundary now says that those conditions still require human evaluation.
- Current disposition
- Editorial clarification only. The propositions, source set, claim classes, confidence statements, and dependency classifications remain unchanged.
- Current evidence weight
- MFTAC-SRC-0045 remains essential for MFTAC-CLM-0027. MFTAC-SRC-0039 and MFTAC-SRC-0046 retain their existing supporting or contextual weights. No weight changed.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0027, MFTAC-CLM-0028
- Remaining dispute
- Lateral reading and SIFT remain useful methods rather than guarantees. Expertise, time, and incomplete evidence still constrain the result.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-LEDGER-PUB-015
Why Correction Is Institutional Strength
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-correction-institutional-strength
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0029, MFTAC-CLM-0030
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0016
Building an Archive That Can Admit It Was Wrong
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-archive-can-admit-wrong
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0031, MFTAC-CLM-0032
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0017
Service Without Conversion
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-service-without-conversion
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0033, MFTAC-CLM-0034
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0018
The Politics of the Locked Door
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-politics-locked-door
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0035, MFTAC-CLM-0036
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
CORRECTED SOURCE STATUSMFTAC-CORR-0019
What Survives a Platform Outage?
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-platform-outage
- Issue submitted
- v20 source-status review overgeneralized NIST’s withdrawn record and treated the whole SP 800-34 Rev. 1 publication as withdrawn.
- Review state
- Corrected after resolving NIST’s initial and updated Rev. 1 records on 2026-08-30.
- Disposition
- NIST CSRC shows the 05/31/2010 Rev. 1 record as withdrawn because it was superseded by the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record. The ledger now points to the updated Final record. MFTAC-SRC-0056 remains supporting—not essential—because the Ministry proposition is independently supported by other sources.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0037, MFTAC-CLM-0038
- Remaining dispute
- No distinct NIST publication was established as a formal superseding replacement for the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record. Adjacent current recovery materials should not be called replacements without an explicit supersession relationship.
- Previous statement
- v20 described SP 800-34 Rev. 1 as withdrawn historical guidance and reduced dependency weight on that basis.
- Original publication state
- At first-edition publication, no post-publication correction had been recorded for this article.
- v20 mistaken interpretation
- The v20 maintenance pass treated all of NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 as withdrawn historical guidance after reading the withdrawal marker on the initial 05/31/2010 record.
- v21 correction
- The next pass resolved NIST’s record lineage: the initial 05/31/2010 Rev. 1 record was withdrawn because the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record superseded it; the updated record is Final.
- Current disposition
- MFTAC-SRC-0056 points to NIST’s updated 11/11/2010 Final record. Its dependency remains supporting rather than essential because the Ministry proposition is independently supported by other sources; that dependency decision is separate from the corrected source-status error.
- Current evidence weight
- Supporting for MFTAC-CLM-0037 and MFTAC-CLM-0038. No essential dependency is created by this source-status correction.
CORRECTED SOURCE STATUS + EDITORIAL CLARIFICATIONMFTAC-CORR-0020
The Six Fires
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-six-fires
- Issue submitted
- v20 source-status review overgeneralized NIST’s withdrawn record and treated the whole SP 800-34 Rev. 1 publication as withdrawn. The v28 voice review also found that the registered declaration “LIGHT THE SAFE TEST” used an undefined institutional safety label where the page actually meant a named failure test.
- Review state
- Source status corrected after resolving NIST’s initial and updated Rev. 1 records on 2026-08-30; declaration wording clarified in v28 without changing its proposition, sources, confidence, dependency classes, or evidence weight.
- Disposition
- NIST CSRC shows the 05/31/2010 Rev. 1 record as withdrawn because it was superseded by the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record. The ledger points to the updated Final record. The declaration now says “LIGHT THE FAILURE TEST” because the six tests expose named dependency failures rather than granting an undefined condition of safety. MFTAC-SRC-0056 remains supporting—not essential—because the Ministry proposition is independently supported by other sources.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0039, MFTAC-CLM-0040
- Remaining dispute
- No distinct NIST publication was established as a formal superseding replacement for the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record. Adjacent current recovery materials should not be called replacements without an explicit supersession relationship. The Six Fires remain a Ministry diagnostic framework, not a validated scientific taxonomy.
- Previous statement
- v20 described SP 800-34 Rev. 1 as withdrawn historical guidance and reduced dependency weight on that basis. Through v27, MFTAC-CLM-0040 said “DO NOT ASK WHETHER THE SYSTEM LOOKS RESILIENT. LIGHT THE SAFE TEST AND SEE WHAT STILL WORKS.”
- Original publication state
- At first-edition publication, no post-publication correction had been recorded for this article.
- v20 mistaken interpretation
- The v20 maintenance pass treated all of NIST SP 800-34 Rev. 1 as withdrawn historical guidance after reading the withdrawal marker on the initial 05/31/2010 record.
- v21 correction
- The next pass resolved NIST’s record lineage: the initial 05/31/2010 Rev. 1 record was withdrawn because the updated 11/11/2010 Rev. 1 record superseded it; the updated record is Final.
- v28 editorial clarification — 2026-08-31
- The declaration changed from “LIGHT THE SAFE TEST” to “LIGHT THE FAILURE TEST.” “Safe” was an undefined Ministry label; “failure” names what the six tests actually inspect. The clarification does not alter the claim’s diagnostic proposition.
- Current disposition
- MFTAC-SRC-0056 points to NIST’s updated 11/11/2010 Final record. Its dependency remains supporting rather than essential because the Ministry proposition is independently supported by other sources. The declaration wording is clarified; the source set, claim classes, confidence, dependency classes, and truth boundary are unchanged.
- Current evidence weight
- Supporting for MFTAC-CLM-0039 and MFTAC-CLM-0040. No essential dependency is created by either the source-status correction or the v28 wording clarification.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0021
What Is a Public Action Circle?
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-public-action-circle
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0041, MFTAC-CLM-0042
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0022
Why We Measure What Was Built
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-measure-what-was-built
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0043, MFTAC-CLM-0044
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0023
The Ministry Does Not Own Your Mind
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-ministry-does-not-own-your-mind
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0045, MFTAC-CLM-0046
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
NO CHANGE AFTER REVIEWMFTAC-CORR-0024
The Question After the Question
- Date opened
- 2026-08-30
- Affected page
- /article-question-after-question
- Issue submitted
- Publication-status record only.
- Review state
- Published; no post-publication correction recorded as of 2026-08-31.
- Disposition
- No correction recorded. This entry is not itself a correction.
- Claim IDs
- MFTAC-CLM-0047, MFTAC-CLM-0048
- Remaining dispute
- Future source changes, reader challenges, or factual corrections remain eligible for review.
REUSABLE LEDGER ENTRY
When a real correction arrives, preserve the whole repair.
- Ledger ID
- Stable identifier.
- Date opened
- When review began.
- Affected page and statement
- Point to the exact public claim.
- Issue submitted
- What is alleged to be wrong, unclear, superseded, or unsupported?
- Source / evidence
- What supports review?
- Review state
- Open, verified, corrected, superseded, retracted, rejected, or no change after review.
- Disposition
- What happened and why?
- Corrected statement
- The smallest accurate replacement, when applicable.
- Superseding page
- Where the current record now lives, when applicable.
- Date closed
- When the disposition was recorded.
- Remaining dispute
- What is still unresolved?
- Notes
- Context needed for reconstruction.
DIFFERENT REPAIRS HAVE DIFFERENT NAMES.
Correction repairs a factual or material error. Clarification makes an accurate statement less ambiguous. Supersession makes a newer version current while preserving the old record. Retraction withdraws a claim that cannot responsibly remain. Rejected records that a proposed correction was reviewed and not adopted.
SUBMIT
Point to the sentence.
The most useful correction is specific enough to reproduce: page, statement, source, problem, and proposed repair.
Follow Antichrist.net on Facebook — opens in a new tabTHE ARCHIVE MUST REMEMBER THAT IT CAN BE WRONG.
SOURCE DEPENDENCY PROPAGATION
A changed source does not automatically erase every article that cited it.
When a Source ID is corrected, withdrawn, superseded, materially changed, or shown to have been misused, the first task is dependency review—not panic and not silence.
Find dependents
Locate every published article and derivative page that cites the Source ID.
Inspect the exact claim
Identify what proposition actually depended on the source.
Classify dependence
Essential, supporting, contextual, or redundant.
Decide the disposition
Correct, clarify, supersede, retract, reject, or leave unchanged after review.
Check derivatives
Inspect summaries, metadata, guides, exports, and Source Ledger notes that may have inherited the claim.
Record propagation
Leave a receipt of what was reviewed and what remains disputed.
TRUTH BOUNDARY
A source changing or disappearing does not prove every dependent conclusion is false. Another independent source may carry the claim, the citation may have been contextual, or the source may have moved without changing content. Dependency classification remains claim-specific.